searchDecoded Research
Who appears when you search for a local business?
Just ten websites accounted for 70% of commercial directory, booking and review platform results across 100 UK local searches.
searchDecoded analysed 1,000 organic Google results across 100 local searches in 20 UK locations, covering plumbers, restaurants, hairdressers, accountants and florists. The study measured how often independent and local businesses appeared directly, and how much space in the results went to directories, booking sites, review platforms and other third parties.
Commercial platforms include directories, booking sites, review platforms and similar third-party services. Forums and social media are counted separately.
Key findings
The same platforms kept appearing
Of results linking to commercial platforms, 148 of 212 belonged to just ten websites.
Searches featured at least one of those ten websites among the recorded results.
Of the top-three plumber positions, 32 of 60 belonged to Checkatrade or TrustATrader.
Together, those ten platforms occupied 148 of all 1,000 organic positions analysed (14.8%). The 70% figure refers specifically to the 212 results belonging to commercial directories, booking sites and review platforms.
Finding 1
A small group of websites appeared again and again
Most independent or local business websites appeared in only one search. The most frequent commercial platforms appeared repeatedly across different towns and cities.
Checkatrade appeared in plumber searches for 19 of 20 locations. Tripadvisor appeared in restaurant searches for all 20.
Ten websites accounted for 69.8% of platform results
Source: searchDecoded, UK local search study 2026. Data v1.4.
View data table
Scroll sideways to see every column.
| Category | Result positions | Percentage |
|---|---|---|
| Ten most frequent platform websites | 148/212 | 69.8% |
| All other platform websites | 64/212 | 30.2% |
Compare website countsSee how many different websites appeared and how often they appeared between them.
Most individual business websites appeared in just one search. A smaller group of platforms appeared repeatedly across different searches.
Scroll sideways to see every column.
| Website group | Different websites | Total appearances |
|---|---|---|
| Independent/local businesses | 444 | 473 |
| Directories and booking or review platforms | 39 | 212 |
One website can appear in several searches. Separate website domains aren't necessarily separate companies.
Finding 2
Directories took more than half of the leading plumber results
Directories and other commercial platforms occupied 35 of the 60 top-three positions across the 20 plumber searches. Checkatrade and TrustATrader alone accounted for 32.
More than half of the leading organic results in these plumber searches belonged to commercial platforms rather than plumbers’ own websites.
There were 20 plumber searches, one for each place. Each contributed three leading organic positions, giving 60 in total.
Finding 3
Platforms were far more prominent for plumbers than florists
Commercial platforms occupied 36% of the first ten results for plumbers, compared with 5.5% for florists.
The gap was wider among the top three results: 58.3% for plumbers versus 1.7% for florists. The type of service made a substantial difference to how often platforms appeared.
These comparisons describe the five search terms tested. They shouldn’t be assumed to represent every search within each industry.
Tripadvisor appeared in all 20 restaurant searches and in the top three in 17. Florist searches showed a different pattern: businesses selling flowers directly accounted for most results, including national online sellers as well as local shops.
Finding 4
Independent and local businesses accounted for 47.3% of results
Of the 1,000 organic results analysed, 473 linked directly to businesses classified as independent or local. Commercial directories, booking sites and review platforms accounted for another 212 positions.
Independent/local is a research classification, not a legal check of small-business status or a count of local shops. It includes national online sellers. Three websites belonging to the Prestige group account for 24 positions in this category.
Commercial platforms were more prominent at the top of the results. They occupied 29.7% of top-three positions, compared with 21.2% across the full first ten.
Compare all results with the top threeView the exact counts and percentages for each type of website.
Scroll sideways to see every column.
| Result type | All results | Top-three results |
|---|---|---|
| Independent/local businesses | 473/1000 (47.3%) | 131/300 (43.7%) |
| Large or chain businesses | 141/1000 (14.1%) | 47/300 (15.7%) |
| Directories and booking or review platforms | 212/1000 (21.2%) | 89/300 (29.7%) |
| Articles and editorial guides | 44/1000 (4.4%) | 15/300 (5%) |
| Forums and social profiles | 70/1000 (7%) | 3/300 (1%) |
| Other or uncertain | 60/1000 (6%) | 15/300 (5%) |
Reddit appeared in 33 of the 1,000 positions, including 1 top-three position. Forums and social profiles remain separate from commercial platforms.
Reading the findings
What the findings mean for local businesses
Appearing in local Google results isn't always a contest between one business and another. Businesses can also compete for space with directories, review sites and booking platforms that appear across many locations.
The contrast was clearest between plumbers and florists. Commercial platforms held 58.3% of the top-three plumber positions but just 1.7% for florists. A business’s search competition can look very different depending on the service it offers.
For a small business, search visibility isn't only about its own website. Commercial platforms where customers discover, compare and choose providers can occupy a substantial share of the results too. These findings don't establish which route will bring that business more enquiries.
These figures measure appearances in search results, not clicks or leads. The study is a snapshot of the searches tested, so it can't show whether platforms are gaining ground over time. Directory costs, website quality and AI-search access weren't measured.
Methodology
How the searches were checked
The sample and classification rules were locked after a ten-search pilot. All 100 searches were then collected afresh under the same method.
Five services in 20 places
The queries combined plumber, restaurant, hairdresser, accountant or florist with a place name, such as ‘plumber Preston’. Every place had the same five searches. Locations covered all four UK nations and all nine English regions, without weighting by population or search demand.
One controlled collection
The results were captured on 28 September 2026 between 14:21 and 15:09 UTC. Collection used one signed-in desktop browser with English and UK preferences and the non-personalisation setting. Google displayed “Results are not personalised”. The browser remained at one UK location; it didn't simulate a resident in each place.
Ten eligible web results
Ads, Maps, AI answers, featured snippets and grouped results were excluded. 52 searches needed a second Google page to reach ten eligible results; 60 positions came from page two. The findings therefore describe the first ten eligible organic results, not page-one share.
Evidence and review
Classification followed the destination’s role and operator. A provider’s own content followed its business category; third-party directories were assessed separately. AI-assisted review was followed by Joel’s targeted review of 47 uncertain cases. This wasn't blind independent double-coding. Each correction produced a new version; the Google results stayed unchanged.
The places in the sample
Preston, Manchester, Newcastle upon Tyne, Leeds, Sheffield, Nottingham, Birmingham, Norwich, London, Brighton, Bristol, Exeter, Glasgow, Edinburgh, Inverness, Cardiff, Swansea, Wrexham, Belfast, Derry.
Limits and remaining uncertainty
The places were deliberately selected for geographic coverage, not randomly sampled. Smaller and rural places are underrepresented. Google can still use location and session context with personalisation turned off, so these results aren't what every UK user would see.
Twelve cases remain uncertain, affecting 13 positions. Ten are business positions with unresolved classification; three are directory positions with unresolved commercial status. One of the ten business positions also has an uncertain provider or agent role.
Independent/local results range from 473 to 483 if every unresolved business is included. Of the supported positions, 219 have explicit ownership or independence evidence; the rest have supported local-operator evidence.
Even if every unresolved directory result and the uncertain agent were counted as commercial platforms, the top ten platforms’ share would change only slightly, from 69.8% to 68.5%. These are alternative classification scenarios, not statistical confidence intervals.
The large/chain category takes precedence where evidence shows 250 or more employees, ten or more branded locations, a qualifying national chain or a large parent group. National delivery and association membership alone don't establish that status. Separate website domains remain separate in the counts, even where ownership is shared.
Open data
Inspect the results and calculations
These v1.4 files are generated from the same frozen data as the charts. Raw search captures and private review records aren't included.
Data licence
searchDecoded’s original and derived study data are available under Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International. When reusing the data, credit searchDecoded, link to this study and the CC BY 4.0 licence, and indicate whether you made changes. Retain any supplied attribution and notices, and do not imply endorsement by searchDecoded. The licence doesn't cover third-party source content, company names or trademarks, or searchDecoded’s website copy, design and branding.
Citation
Reference the study
Cite the published study and data version using one of the formats below.
Choose a citation formatCopy the reference as Web, Markdown, HTML or Harvard.
Citation conventions vary between publishers and institutions. Check any house style before submitting.